Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 05:25

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Finebaum on House settlement: NCAA dead, Olympic and women sports crushed, football wins - AL.com
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
NBA Finals’ 17 best players ranked for Thunder vs. Pacers series - SBNation.com
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Why don't some people like the 10 Commandments?
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Quis sed officia eum accusantium animi.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.